Okay, so my next great adventure was the British Museum (complete with reading room, and newly enclosed forecourt, shown above. That's Mark and Sarah, my fabulous hosts/housemates, in the pics above).
The British Museum is the world's oldest museum, free to the public since its inception in 1753. The British Museum Act of that year decrees that "This museum, and all its exhibits herein, shall be freely available to all Studious and Curious Persons". It's an awesome concept - and all because a bloke named Hans Sloane, a doctor and professional collector, donated his collection to the Crown (in exchange for a sum of money to be given to his descendents), which at the time of his death comprised several hundred thousand insect/plant specimens and hundreds of manuscripts, prints, pictures, coins and other curiosities collected from around the world.
So as such, the British Museum isn't so much a museum of things from Britain. In fact, my housemate Mark (partner to the lovely Sarah, and English), says it's more accurately described as "The Museum of Stuff We Nicked". Consequently, there's lots about this place that bothers me. Parts of the Acropolis from
I’m not denying the contribution of countless dedicated (and independently wealthy) archaeologists to Egyptology or the importance of exchanging knowledge to further our understanding of and tolerance for other cultures. But what’s missing, for me, is the story of how this stuff was collected – and whether the people from whom it was taken have ever consented to it being here.
Various displays blithely describe how many of the practices documented in their museum have since “died out”, with no acknowledgement that British explorers brought disease, violence or disinheritance that may have contributed to that. I know that Aboriginal Australians lobbied for years before finally getting agreement this week from the Musum for the return of some of the bones of their ancestors. You can read about it in The Age). The whole thing smacks of lingering colonialism and presumptions of superiority (even some of the commentaries still refer to ‘primitive’ people).
I’m not arguing from a position of moral superiority.
So much of the museum left me feeling badly uncomfortable – I suspect there are big chunks of the collection that I will never look over.
2 comments:
What is wrong with those people???!! The descendants of those aborigies just want to bury their ancestor's bones, right? Well, the scientists would only have "scientific" reasons to keep them. At this point I would think that all of the "research", probing, analyzing, etc. that would be done HAS already been done. What's the problem? Just make a plaster cast and display the replica. they do that with dinosaur bones, right? I'll never understand that type of attitude. Good for them for insisting. I hope they keep at it and get ALL the bones back.
Hey, keep writing. It's very interesting. Have fun!!!
I agree entirely...give em back..they prolly havent had a good lokk at em scientifically for ages anyway...probably since phrenology went out the door as a science to say if you had a bigger head your were more "technologically & socially" advanced!!
VERY jealous Georgi re the museums....reckon I would just be as bad to be walking around museums with...jainee would probably just leave me there and come back 3 days later hehehe
Some of the stuff you have been looking at would get the goosebumps going wot!!
Post a Comment